Rucaparib versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (ARIEL4): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Few prospective studies have compared poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to chemotherapy for the treatment of BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. We aimed to assess rucaparib versus platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in this setting. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study (ARIEL4), conducted in 64 hospitals and cancer centres across 12 countries (Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, the UK, and the USA), we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who had received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1), using an interactive response technology and block randomisation (block size of six) and stratified by progression-free interval after the most recent platinum-containing therapy, to oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or chemotherapy (administered per institutional guidelines). Patients assigned to the chemotherapy group with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive disease were given paclitaxel (starting dose 60-80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15); those with fully platinum-sensitive disease received platinum-based chemotherapy (single-agent cisplatin or carboplatin, or platinum-doublet chemotherapy). Patients were treated in 21-day or 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, assessed in the efficacy population (all randomly assigned patients with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations without reversion mutations), and then in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of assigned study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02855944; enrolment is complete, and the study is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2017, and Sept 24, 2020, 930 patients were screened, of whom 349 eligible patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib (n=233) or chemotherapy (n=116). Median age was 58 years (IQR 52-64) and 332 (95%) patients were White. As of data cutoff (Sept 30, 2020), median follow-up was 25·0 months (IQR 13·8-32·5). In the efficacy population (220 patients in the rucaparib group; 105 in the chemotherapy group), median progression-free survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 7·3-9·1) in the rucaparib group versus 5·7 months (5·5-7·3) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64 [95% CI 0·49-0·84]; p=0·0010). In the intention-to-treat population (233 in the rucaparib group; 116 in the chemotherapy group), median progression-free survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7-7·9) in the rucaparib group versus 5·7 months (5·5-6·7) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·52-0·86]; p=0·0017). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (in 52 [22%] of 232 patients in the rucaparib group vs six [5%] of 113 in the chemotherapy group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 62 (27%) patients in the rucaparib group versus 13 (12%) in the chemotherapy group; serious adverse events considered related to treatment by the investigator occurred in 32 (14%) patients in the rucaparib group and six (5%) in the chemotherapy group. Three deaths were considered to be potentially related to rucaparib (one due to cardiac disorder, one due to myelodysplastic syndrome, and one with an unconfirmed cause). INTERPRETATION: Results from the ARIEL4 study support rucaparib as an alternative treatment option to chemotherapy for patients with relapsed, BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. FUNDING: Clovis Oncology.

Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in childhood: incidence, clinical profile and risk factors in a national prospective population-based cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the epidemiology, clinical profile and risk factors of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) in children aged 1-16 years. METHODS: A national prospective population-based cohort study over 25 months. Newly diagnosed PTCS cases notified via British Paediatric Surveillance Unit were ascertained using classical diagnostic criteria and categorised according to 2013 revised diagnostic criteria. We derived national age, sex and weight-specific annual incidence rates and assessed effects of sex and weight categories. RESULTS: We identified 185 PTCS cases of which 166 also fulfilled revised diagnostic criteria. The national annual incidence (95% CI) of PTCS in children aged 1-16 years was 0.71 (0.57 to 0.87) per 100 000 population increasing with age and weight to 4.18 and 10.7 per 100 000 in obese boys and girls aged 12-15 years, respectively. Incidence rates under 7 years were similar in both sexes. From 7 years onwards, the incidence in girls was double that in boys, but only in overweight (including obese) children. In children aged 12-15 years, an estimated 82% of the incidence of PTCS was attributable to obesity. Two subgroups of PTCS were apparent: 168 (91%) cases aged from 7 years frequently presented on medication and with headache and were predominantly female and obese. The remaining 17 (9%) cases under 7 years often lacked these risk factors and commonly presented with paralytic squint. CONCLUSIONS: This uniquely large population-based study of childhood PTCS will inform the design of future intervention studies. It suggests that weight reduction is central to the prevention of PTCS.

Treatment with PF-04449913, an oral smoothened antagonist, in patients with myeloid malignancies: a phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics study.

BACKGROUND: Activation of the Hedgehog signalling pathway contributes to cancer progression and the development of myeloid leukaemia stem cell therapeutic resistance. We aimed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose of the selective Hedgehog antagonist PF-04449913 in myeloid malignancies. METHODS: We undertook an open-label, dose-finding, standard 3+3 design phase 1 study of PF-04449913 in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, chronic myeloid leukaemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myelofibrosis who were refractory, resistant, or intolerant to previous treatments, at three centres in the USA and one in Italy. Patients who had newly diagnosed, untreated disease were included if they were not eligible for standard treatment options or if standard treatments were not deemed appropriate. Patients received PF-04449913 once daily continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or patient withdrawal for up to 12 28-day cycles. Additional cycles were given if patients showed evidence of clinical benefit. The starting dose was 5 mg and was increased by 100% until the first dose-limiting toxic effect (DLT) and by 50% thereafter, in keeping with a 3+3 clinical trial statistical design. The primary endpoint was first-cycle DLTs. Secondary endpoints were safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00953758. FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2010, and Sept 7, 2012, 47 patients were enrolled and included in the study: 28 with acute myeloid leukaemia, six with myelodysplastic syndrome, five with chronic myeloid leukaemia (two with chronic-phase and three with blast-phase disease), one with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, and seven with myelofibrosis. Patients received PF-04449913 once daily at 5 mg (n=3), 10 mg (n=3), 20 mg (n=4), 40 mg (n=4), 80 mg (n=8), 120 mg (n=3), 180 mg (n=3), 270 mg (n=5), 400 mg (n=9), and 600 mg (n=5). Two patients experienced DLTs (one each in the 80 mg and 600 mg dose groups). The MTD for PF-04449913 was established to be 400 mg once daily. Of the 47 patients enrolled, 28 (60%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, three of which were grade 4 in severity. The most common treatment-related adverse events included dysgeusia (13 [28%] patients), decreased appetite (nine [19%]), and alopecia (seven [15%]). None of the 15 deaths reported were treatment related. Pharmacokinetics seemed to be dose proportional. The mean half-life was 23·9 h (SD 14·0) in the MTD group. Some suggestion of clinical activity was noted in 23 (49%) of 47 patients with haematological malignancies. Based on these results, the recommended phase 2 dose was 200 mg or lower once daily. INTERPRETATION: Based on these findings, PF-04449913 is being tested in phase 2 studies in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukaemia, and myelofibrosis. FUNDING: Pfizer.

A Phase I, dose-finding study in patients with advanced solid malignancies of the oral γ-secretase inhibitor PF-03084014.

PURPOSE: To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for continuous oral administration of the γ-secretase inhibitor PF-03084014, determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and evaluate safety and preliminary activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This open-label, phase I study consisted of a dose-finding portion based on a 3+3 design, followed by an expansion cohort. PF-03084014 was administered orally, twice daily (BID) for 21 continuous days. Tested doses ranged from 20 to 330 mg BID. In the expansion cohort, patients were to receive the estimated MTD or a lower dose of PF-03084014. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients received treatment. The MTD was estimated to be 220 mg BID. The RP2D was determined to be 150 mg BID, based on the better safety profile versus the 220-mg BID dose, given comparable NOTCH-related target inhibition. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, vomiting, rash, and decreased appetite, which were generally mild to moderate in severity. One patient with advanced thyroid cancer had a complete response, and five of seven response-evaluable patients with desmoid tumor achieved a partial response (71.4% objective response rate). Tumor responses were mostly durable, ranging from 1.74+ to 24+ months. PF-03084014 demonstrated a generally dose-dependent pharmacokinetic profile at doses ranging from 20 to 330 mg BID. Consistent downmodulation of NOTCH-related HES4 gene expression was observed in peripheral blood from all evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Further development of PF-03084014 for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors is warranted and currently under evaluation.

A phase I study of PF-04449913, an oral hedgehog inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of single-agent PF-04449913, and to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A 3+3 design was used in this open-label, multicenter, phase I study and dose escalation/de-escalation applied until identification of the MTD. PF-04449913 was orally administered once daily in continuous 28-day treatment cycles. The starting dose was 80 mg. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were enrolled; 19 were evaluable for first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The first-cycle DLT rate at the 640 mg dose level was 33.3%, and the MTD was estimated to be 320 mg once daily. The recommended phase II dose was not determined. PF-04449913 was generally well tolerated at doses of 80 to 320 mg once daily. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AE) were grade 1-2 dysgeusia, fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, dizziness, dehydration, and diarrhea. Treatment-related grade 3 AEs only occurred in patients receiving PF-04449913 640 mg once daily. No treatment-related grade 4-5 AEs were reported. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated a generally dose-proportional kinetics with biphasic elimination, supporting once-daily dosing. PF-04449913 modulated hedgehog signaling at the dose levels tested, as demonstrated by >80% downregulation of GLI1 expression in the skin of treated patients. Eight patients (34.8%) achieved stable disease; none had complete or partial response. Three patients with disease progression at enrollment had prolonged disease stabilization (≥6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study support further evaluation of PF-04449913 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Inhibition of α4ß1 integrin increases ovarian cancer response to carboplatin.

OBJECTIVE: The inability to successfully treat women with ovarian cancer is due to the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis and the development of platinum resistance. Ovarian cancer metastasizes throughout the peritoneal cavity by attaching to and invading through the mesothelium lining the peritoneum using a mechanism that involves α4ß1 integrin and its ligand (vascular cell adhesion molecule) VCAM-1. Integrin α4ß1 expression on tumor cells is known to confer protection from therapy in other cancers, notably multiple myeloma. We evaluated the role of α4ß1 integrin in response to platinum-based therapy in a mouse model of peritoneal ovarian cancer metastasis by treatment with a humanized anti-α4ß1 integrin function-blocking antibody. METHODS: Integrin α4ß1 expression on primary human ovarian cancer cells, fallopian tube and ovarian surface epithelia and fresh tumor was assessed by flow-cytometry. The therapeutic impact of anti-α4ß1 treatment was assessed in murine models of platinum-resistant peritoneal disease and in vitro using the platinum resistant ovarian cancer cell lines. RESULTS: Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with human-specific α4ß1 integrin function-blocking antibodies, anti-VCAM-1 antibody or carboplatin alone had no effect on tumor burden compared to the IgG control group. However, the combined treatment of anti-α4ß1 integrin or anti-VCAM-1 with carboplatin significantly reduced tumor burden. In vitro, the combination of carboplatin and anti-α4ß1 integrin antibodies resulted in increased cell death and doubling time. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a role for α4ß1 integrin in regulating treatment response to carboplatin, implicating α4ß1 integrin as a potential therapeutic target to influence platinum responsiveness in otherwise resistant disease.

Integrin-blocking antibodies delay keratinocyte re-epithelialization in a human three-dimensional wound healing model.

The alpha6beta4 integrin plays a significant role in tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis through modulation of growth factor signaling, and is a potentially important therapeutic target. However, alpha6beta4-mediated cell-matrix adhesion is critical in normal keratinocyte attachment, signaling and anchorage to the basement membrane through its interaction with laminin-5, raising potential risks for targeted therapy. Bioengineered Human Skin Equivalent (HSE), which have been shown to mimic their normal and wounded counterparts, have been used here to investigate the consequences of targeting beta4 to establish toxic effects on normal tissue homeostasis and epithelial wound repair. We tested two antibodies directed to different beta4 epitopes, one adhesion-blocking (ASC-8) and one non-adhesion blocking (ASC-3), and determined that these antibodies were appropriately localized to the basal surface of keratinocytes at the basement membrane interface where beta4 is expressed. While normal tissue architecture was not altered, ASC-8 induced a sub-basal split at the basement membrane in non-wounded tissue. In addition, wound closure was significantly inhibited by ASC-8, but not by ASC-3, as the epithelial tongue only covered 40 percent of the wound area at 120 hours post-wounding. These results demonstrate beta4 adhesion-blocking antibodies may have adverse effects on normal tissue, whereas antibodies directed to other epitopes may provide safer alternatives for therapy. Taken together, we conclude that these three-dimensional tissue models provide a biologically relevant platform to identify toxic effects induced by candidate therapeutics, which will allow generation of findings that are more predictive of in vivo responses early in the drug development process.

Antibodies directed to alpha6beta4 highlight the adhesive and signaling functions of the integrin in breast cancer cell lines.

Integrin alpha6beta4 signaling interactions have been implicated in tumor progression, and beta4 expression has been linked to poor prognosis in certain breast cancer subtypes. We generated human antibodies to alpha6beta4 to further evaluate its role in tumor cell signaling. Biochemical characterization indicated these antibodies are specific for alpha6beta4, recognize distinct epitopes and have low nanomolar affinities for both human and murine protein. The antibodies demonstrated differing effects on alpha6beta4-mediated cellular adhesion, highlighting the existence of different functional epitopes on alpha6beta4. Interestingly however both antibodies blocked adhesion-independent growth in a panel of breast cancer cell lines. Antibody induced apoptosis and inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling were also observed within the context of matrix adhesion. Enhanced inhibitory effects were observed when the alpha6beta4 antibodies were used in combination with antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or erythoblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ErbB2). These findings illustrate a role for both the adhesive and signaling functions of alpha6beta4 in breast cancer cell survival. The antibodies and data generated herein advance our understanding of alpha6beta4 in regulating tumorigenic processes, and suggest that combination therapies involving alpha6beta4 may be therapeutically effective in breast cancer.

Functional characterization of integrin alpha6beta4 adhesion interactions using soluble integrin constructs reveals the involvement of different functional domains in the beta4 subunit.

Integrin alpha6beta4-mediated adhesion interactions play key roles in keratinocyte and epithelial tumor cell biology. In order to evaluate how alpha6beta4 adhesion interactions contribute to these important cellular processes, the authors generated soluble versions of the integrin by recombinant expression of the subunit ectodomains fused to a human immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc constant domain. Coexpression of the appropriate subunits enabled dimerization, secretion and purification of stable Fc-containing alpha6beta4 heterodimers. The soluble proteins exhibited the same metal ion and ligand dependency in their binding characteristics as intact alpha6beta4. Using these reagents in combination with anti-beta4 antibodies, the authors identified two distinct functional epitopes on the beta4 subunit. They demonstrated the involvement of one epitope in adhesion interactions and the other in regulating adhesion-independent growth in alpha6beta4-expressing tumor cell lines. The availability of these soluble integrin reagents and the data provided herein help to further delineate the structure-function relationships regulating alpha6beta4 signaling biology.

Novel insights on human NK cells' immunological modalities revealed by gene expression profiling.

As part of the innate immune system, human NK cells play a critical role early in the systemic host defense against pathogens and tumor cells. Recent studies suggest a more complex view of NK cell behavior, as different functions and tissue localizing capabilities seem to be preferentially assigned to distinct subpopulations of NK cells, CD56(dim)CD16(+) or CD56(bright)CD16(-). In this study, we used oligonucleotide microarrays to compare the expression profile of approximately 20,000 genes in three NK cell subpopulations: peripheral blood-derived CD56(dim)CD16(+), CD56(bright)CD16(-), and in vitro-activated CD16(+) NK cells. The differential expression of selected genes was verified by flow cytometry and functional assays. When comparing CD56(dim)CD16(+) and CD56(bright)CD16(-) subsets, a new heterogeneous molecular basis for the functional and developmental differences between these two subsets was revealed. Furthermore, systematic analysis of transcriptional changes in activated CD16(+) NK cells provided us with a better understanding of NK function in inflamed tissues. We highlight a number of genes that were overexpressed upon activation (e.g., OX40 ligand, CD86, Tim3, galectins, etc.), that enable these cells to directly cross-talk with other innate and adaptive immune effectors. The overexpressed genes assign novel intriguing immunomodulatory functions to activated NK cells, in addition to their potent cytotoxic abilities.